Difference between revisions of "Ella Thompson v. J. C. Aldredge, Sheriff: 1939"
From OutHistory
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
With all the judges concurring, Justice Grice of the Georgia Supreme Court ruled: | With all the judges concurring, Justice Grice of the Georgia Supreme Court ruled: | ||
| − | This record presents the question whether the crime of sodomy, as defined by our law, can be accomplished between two women. By Code…sodomy is defined as "the carnal knowledge and connection against the order of nature, by man with man, or in the same unnatural manner with woman." Wharton, in his Criminal Law…lays down the rub that "the crime of sodomy proper can not-be accomplished between two women, though the crime of bestiality may be." We have no reason to believe that our law-makers in defining the crime of sodomy intended to give it any different meaning. Indeed the language of the Code above quoted seems to us to deliberately exclude the idea that this particular crime may be accomplished by two women, although it may be committed by two men, or a man and a woman. That the act here alleged to have been committed is just as loathsome when participated in by two women does not justify us in reading into the definition of the crime something which the lawmakers omitted. | + | :This record presents the question whether the crime of sodomy, as defined by our law, can be accomplished between two women. By Code…sodomy is defined as "the carnal knowledge and connection against the order of nature, by man with man, or in the same unnatural manner with woman." Wharton, in his Criminal Law…lays down the rub that "the crime of sodomy proper can not-be accomplished between two women, though the crime of bestiality may be." We have no reason to believe that our law-makers in defining the crime of sodomy intended to give it any different meaning. Indeed the language of the Code above quoted seems to us to deliberately exclude the idea that this particular crime may be accomplished by two women, although it may be committed by two men, or a man and a woman. That the act here alleged to have been committed is just as loathsome when participated in by two women does not justify us in reading into the definition of the crime something which the lawmakers omitted. |
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| − | + | This ruling established the legal precedent in Georgia that | |
| − | :The crime of sodomy as defined by statute cannot be accomplished between two women.<ref>''South Eastern Reporter''… vol. 200 (Jan.-March 19391, (St. Paul, Minn.: West, 1939), p. 799-800. | + | :The crime of sodomy as defined by statute cannot be accomplished between two women.<ref>''South Eastern Reporter''… vol. 200 (Jan.-March 19391, (St. Paul, Minn.: West, 1939), p. 799-800. Legal citations: Thompson v. Aldredge, 200 S. E. 799; 187 Ga. 467. |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 09:33, 16 October 2008
"Sodomy . . . cannot be accomplished by two women"
by Jonathan Ned Katz. Copyright (c) 2008 by Jonathan Ned Katz. All rights reserved. Reedited by Katz from Gay American History (1976).
PROTECTED ENTRY: This entry by a named creator or site administrator can be changed only by that creator and site administrators, so they are responsible for its accuracy, coverage, evidence, and clarity. Please do use this entry's Comment section at the bottom of the page to suggest improvements. Thanks.
On January 12, 1939, the Georgia Supreme Court issued its decision in the proceeding by plaintiff Ella Thompson against Sheriff J. C. Aldredge to review an earlier adverse judgment against her in the Superior Court of Fulton County. The tantalizingly brief report of Thompson's appeal records one of the rare Lesbian related legal cases in American history. Ella Thompson's appeal represents a courageous and unusual act of resistance against an attempt at the legal prosecution of sexual activity between two women.
- Ella Thompson had been convicted in lower court on "an indictment charging her with sodomy, both participants in the act being alleged to be females!' Thompson appealed, her lawyers asking that the indictment be discharged on the grounds that she "is being illegally restrained of her liberty, in that the indictment on which she was convicted was null and void.”
With all the judges concurring, Justice Grice of the Georgia Supreme Court ruled:
- This record presents the question whether the crime of sodomy, as defined by our law, can be accomplished between two women. By Code…sodomy is defined as "the carnal knowledge and connection against the order of nature, by man with man, or in the same unnatural manner with woman." Wharton, in his Criminal Law…lays down the rub that "the crime of sodomy proper can not-be accomplished between two women, though the crime of bestiality may be." We have no reason to believe that our law-makers in defining the crime of sodomy intended to give it any different meaning. Indeed the language of the Code above quoted seems to us to deliberately exclude the idea that this particular crime may be accomplished by two women, although it may be committed by two men, or a man and a woman. That the act here alleged to have been committed is just as loathsome when participated in by two women does not justify us in reading into the definition of the crime something which the lawmakers omitted.
- The petitioner's conviction was a nullity and she is entitled to be discharged.
- Judgment reversed.
This ruling established the legal precedent in Georgia that
- The crime of sodomy as defined by statute cannot be accomplished between two women.[1]
References
- ↑ South Eastern Reporter… vol. 200 (Jan.-March 19391, (St. Paul, Minn.: West, 1939), p. 799-800. Legal citations: Thompson v. Aldredge, 200 S. E. 799; 187 Ga. 467. Nine issues of a lesbian monthly, Vice Versa, were privately published (typewritten) and distributed in Los Angeles between June 1947, and Feb, 1948, by a woman who called herself Lisa Ben (an anagram for Lesbian). Vice Versa is the earliest-known American publication designed especially for Lesbians. Its 71/2- by 11-inch pages included play, film, and hok reviews, poetry, short stories, editorials, and an annotated bibliography of novels, a11 concerned with Lesbianism. The editor is said to have previously "achieved some note in the science-fiction field" ("Vice Versa," Homosexuals Today; A Handbook of Organizations and Publication, ed. Marvin Cutler pseud.]. [Los Angeles: ONE, Inc., 19561, p. 4, 9031.) Excerpts (mostly poetry) from Vice Versa appear throughout The Ladder and may be found listed in the index to that Lesbian periodical (photo reprint, N.Y.: Arno, 1975). Excerpts from Vice Versa also appear throughout ONE Magazine. The Library of the Homosexual Information Center in Los Angeles has copies of all but issue no. 7 of Vice Versa.
