Difference between revisions of "Polk Street Merchants Push Back"

From OutHistory
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: Polk Gulch merchants viewed this influx with alarm. While intergenerational and commercial sex had long been a part of the culture, and merchants hired attractive youth to bartend and wait...)
 
m (Protected "Polk Street Merchants Push Back" [edit=sysop:move=sysop])
 
(5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
Text by Joey Plaster. Copyright (©) by C. Joey Plaster, 2009. All rights reserved.
 +
 +
 
Polk Gulch merchants viewed this influx with alarm. While intergenerational and commercial sex had long been a part of the culture, and merchants hired attractive youth to bartend and wait tables, they perceived the movement of “trade” hustling to the street as a threat to their economy.  
 
Polk Gulch merchants viewed this influx with alarm. While intergenerational and commercial sex had long been a part of the culture, and merchants hired attractive youth to bartend and wait tables, they perceived the movement of “trade” hustling to the street as a threat to their economy.  
  
−
They responded by calling on what were now strong connections with City Hall. In 1977, merchants met with Mayor Moscone to complain about the “teen-age prostitutes, drug addicts and shoplifters are turning Polk Street into a nightmare – ‘the Haight Ashbury of the ‘70s.’” The president of the Polk Street Merchant’s Association said, “old ladies with white gloves aren’t shopping on Polk Street anymore.”   
+
[[Image:PolkStreetscene.jpg|thumb|none|635px|Polk Street scene, 1977. Courtesy of the GLBTHS, Crawford Barton collection.]]
 +
 
 +
They responded by calling on what were now strong connections with City Hall. In 1977, merchants met with Mayor Moscone to complain about the “teen-age prostitutes, drug addicts and shoplifters are turning Polk Street into a nightmare – ‘the Haight Ashbury of the ‘70s.’” The president of the Polk Street Merchant’s Association said, “old ladies with white gloves aren’t shopping on Polk Street anymore.”<ref> “Polk St. a jungle, merchants gripe,” San Francisco Examiner, Sept. 30, 1977, p. 4 c. 1</ref>    
 +
 
 +
 
 +
The owner of the Town Squire complained that “street youth, many of them gay hustlers,” called women entering his store “the filthiest names you’ve ever heard.”<ref> Ibid.  </ref>  The owner of one restaurant said he was closing his business after his window was shattered yesterday for the fifth time in two years. “People are afraid of the punks,” he said. “They’re dangerous.”<ref> “Polk Street’s ‘punks’ anger merchants,” San Francisco Chronicle, Sept 30, 1977, p. 3 c. 1</ref> 
  
−
The owner of the Town Squire complained that “street youth, many of them gay hustlers,” called women entering his store “the filthiest names you’ve ever heard.”  The owner of one restaurant said he was closing his business after his window was shattered yesterday for the fifth time in two years. “People are afraid of the punks,” he said. “They’re dangerous.” 
 
  
 
The Mayor responded with a sustained police sweep, for which hundreds of merchants congratulated the Northern Station in a lavish formal ceremony at the P.S. Lounge, including Mayor Moscone and the police chief, for “removing the criminal element from our streets.”  
 
The Mayor responded with a sustained police sweep, for which hundreds of merchants congratulated the Northern Station in a lavish formal ceremony at the P.S. Lounge, including Mayor Moscone and the police chief, for “removing the criminal element from our streets.”  
  
−
These included prostitutes, drug dealers, and panhandlers “believed to be displaced…from the Market Street and Tenderloin areas where successful police efforts were making it difficult for these would-be lawbreakers,” said the president of the association, an owner of a liquor store. “Today, these officers continue to patrol the streets of our area insuring that the criminal element does not attempt once again to move in.”  The association president framed the sweep as a gay rights victory: it “enabled all residents to pursue their lifestyles peacefully and successfully,” he said.
 
  
−
Others framed the sweep as a curtailment of civil liberties that ran counter to gay rights struggles. One newsletter complained of “Anita Bryant’s Vagrancy Law:” “Now you can get busted for ‘standing’, ‘sitting’, or even ‘being’ in private doorways or on your street!,” it read, noting that City Hall ordered the sweeps just before the November city election. In early 1978, the ACLU noted “numerous complaints…that the [loitering] ordinance has been extensively used by the police as a means to harass come Gays on Polk Street.” 
+
These included prostitutes, drug dealers, and panhandlers “believed to be displaced…from the Market Street and Tenderloin areas where successful police efforts were making it difficult for these would-be lawbreakers,” said the president of the association, an owner of a liquor store. “Today, these officers continue to patrol the streets of our area insuring that the criminal element does not attempt once again to move in.”  The association president framed the sweep as a gay rights victory: it “enabled all residents to pursue their lifestyles peacefully and successfully,” he said.<ref>  “Police Honored By Polk Area Merchants,” Bay Area Reporter, 1/19/78. </ref>
  
−
Merchants won several large-scale police sweeps from 1977 to 1981, as they sought to eject the displaced population, while activists and citizens continued to complain of indiscriminate checks by police, citations for jaywalking, police harassment, and in some cases abuse.
 
  
−
The late 1970s saw the Polk gay business community at their economic and political peak. San Francisco saw its first district-based elections in November 1977, after which the sources of power that had drawn from downtown citywide base, including downtown business and labor, “found their influence strongly reduced, while neighborhood groups grew in power.”
+
Others framed the sweep as a curtailment of civil liberties that ran counter to gay rights struggles. One newsletter complained of “Anita Bryant’s Vagrancy Law:” “Now you can get busted for ‘standing’, ‘sitting’, or even ‘being’ in private doorways or on your street!,” it read, noting that City Hall ordered the sweeps just before the November city election.<ref>“Repeal Anita Bryant’s New Vagrancy Law in S.F.,” Polk Street News No.  2, Sept. 1977. </ref>  In early 1978, the ACLU noted “numerous complaints…that the [loitering] ordinance has been extensively used by the police as a means to harass come Gays on Polk Street.”<ref>“Polk Harassment? ACLU Protests New Loitering Law,” Bay Area Reporter, 3/2/78. </ref> 
  
−
“The Polk Street Merchants Association was always very powerful politically,” Friday said. Polk Street “could make or break some local politicians….This is a small town. If you want to run for supervisor especially in a district…you’re naturally going to kiss ass to the merchants in the community, cause the merchants have the money.”
 
  
−
Between August and September 1981, Mayor Feinstein ordered a massive, sustained police sweep on Polk Street at the behest of merchant association members concerned about the number of street youth on the street impinging on their business. Police made 449 arrests on Polk Street. But the aftermath of these sweeps, the result of a number of economic and political convergences, would result in a significant change for the neighborhood as the city shifted their approach to managing street youth.
+
Merchants won several large-scale police sweeps from 1977 to 1981, as they sought to eject the displaced population, while activists and citizens continued to complain of indiscriminate checks by police, citations for jaywalking, police harassment, and in some cases abuse.  
  
−
Police sweeps to social service
 
  
−
Starting in 1977, openly gay, “progressive” politicians had made significant inroads in local and federal government, and with the second district election in 1979, “progressives for the first time had substantial representation on the board.”  The assassination of Harvey Milk and Mayor Moscone in 1978, and the furor over the light sentence given to Dan White the following year set off a string of events that changed San Francisco and the path of the LGBT civil rights movement.  
+
The late 1970s saw the Polk gay business community at their economic and political peak. San Francisco saw its first district-based elections in November 1977, after which the sources of power that had drawn from downtown citywide base, including downtown business and labor, “found their influence strongly reduced, while neighborhood groups grew in power.”<ref> Hartman, City for Sale, 234.</ref>
  
−
Community United Against Violence, the nation’s first gay anti-violence organization, was founded. Jo Daly was appointed as the first openly LGBT person appointed to the San Francisco Police Commission in 1980, and “progressive” gay activist Harry Britt succeeded Harvey Milk. District Attorney Joseph Freitas, blamed for the White manslaughter verdict, lost in his 1981 re-election bid to Arlo Smith, a liberal supported by the progressive gay community. “Progressive” activists had long framed Polk Street police sweeps as an attack on civil liberties. They now had the support of the City to resist these sweeps.
 
  
−
Ron Huberman, hired as a criminal investigator in 1981 as part of a campaign promise to hire gays in the District Attorney’s Office, helped decide whether or not to prosecute the cases brought before the office as a result of the police sweep. Framing the arrests as “police abuse,” the office decided to “explain to the police the fact that they’re wasting their time and their money issuing frivolous citations that go nowhere.” With Arlo Smith’s stamp of approval, “I would say 90% of the prostitution, 98% of the jaywalking, urinating in public, and all that were thrown out.” 
+
“The Polk Street Merchants Association was always very powerful politically,” Friday said. Polk Street “could make or break some local politicians….This is a small town. If you want to run for supervisor especially in a district…you’re naturally going to kiss ass to the merchants in the community, cause the merchants have the money.”<ref> Interview with Wayne Friday by Joey Plaster, 2008. </ref>
  
−
Gay activists seized on the District Attorney numbers to argue that police were harassing gays on Polk Street. The city’s Human Rights Commission noted that “the most common charge (18%) was…obstructing the sidewalk.…About 87% of the cases were discharged/dismissed by the District Attorney.”  Supervisor Harry Britt characterized the increased law enforcement as a systematic harassment of Gays.
 
  
−
Central City Hospitality House, a social service organization that had formed in 1966 to care for homeless youth in the Tenderloin, noted that police sweeps had simply “moved youth from the Mission, to the Haight, to the Tenderloin, and to Polk Street.” They tartly suggested that the police “reconsider its approach to using decoys offering money to tempt unsuspecting and hungry youth.” 
+
Between August and September 1981, Mayor Feinstein ordered a massive, sustained police sweep on Polk Street at the behest of merchant association members concerned about the number of street youth on the street impinging on their business. Police made 449 arrests on Polk Street. But the aftermath of these sweeps, the result of a number of economic and political convergences, would result in a significant change for the neighborhood as the city shifted their approach to managing street youth.   
−
 
 
−
“The Merchants Association appear to be alone in their praise of Mayor Feinstein,” the Bay Area Reporter claimed. “Criticism of her judgment in allowing these procedures to be used to temporarily clean up Polk Street are overwhelming. She has been criticized for not having the foresight to being in the many social service organizations in the City to work towards a permanent solution to the problem.”  
 
  
−
Under siege, Feinstein justified the arrests in a Bay Area Reporter editorial, noting that the arrests were intended to reverse a pattern of violence, drug abuse and prostitution,” she wrote. “Lawlessness has a grim way of compounding itself and spreading, and this Administration is not going to ignore reports by residents and merchants that their street is no longer safe….More police are on the streets, more arrests are being made and, as a result, the most indiscriminate crime of violence – assault – is down seven percent from last year.”
+
<references/>
  
−
The next month, the congregation of Polk Street’s Old First Presbyterian Church collaborated with CUAV to host community discussions about the increased numbers of youth on the street and the police sweeps. Out of these discussions, they developed a two-pronged argument for serving youth instead of arresting them.
 
  
−
Focusing on the youngest and newest additions to the street, they characterized the youth not as criminals, but as “victims” that had been turned out from homes across the country and needed a “surrogate family” in San Francisco. They also noted that the longer youth were on the street, the more likely they were to become part of the underground economy and culture.
 
  
−
The church then leveraged their moral authority to argue for such a family. The “lack of a vigorous community response, in an effort to provide alternatives for these youth forced to prostitute in order to survive, represents community child abuse,” they argued in a promotional flier. “Our primary purpose is to enable those most vulnerable (younger youth and those new to the streets) to exit from street life and prostitution.”
+
{{Protected}}
  
−
Their work was supported by research by Harvard-educated ethnographer and gay activist Toby Marotta, who was hired by URSA in 1977 to produce a Carter administration-funded study about youth prostitution across the country. In completing the study report in 1981, they also framed the conflict not as one of crime and profit, but as an opportunity for the upscale gay community to encourage an upwardly mobile, gay-identified path for the youth.
 
  
−
“Our case was, homosexual young people, struggling with their gay identity, need to be in the best possible neighborhood,” he said. At the time, Polk Street was “an upscale neighborhood, and thereby an escape, a haven, from the Tenderloin,” Marotta said. He advocated for a space that “would have gays as staffers and programs for gays and therapists sensitive to gays, and gay-identified clients, in a turf that would be more nurturing accepting and productive for them.” 
 
  
−
In 1983, Polk Street Town Hall, URSA, and two other nonprofits formed a consortium and secured a 12-month demonstration grant from the Department of Health and Human Services to create a multi-service center for homeless youth. The center was established in the Polk Gulch neighborhood, and became Larkin Street Youth, later a national model for a harm-reduction approach to street youth.
+
[[Category: Commerce]]
 +
[[Category:Polk Street]]
 +
[[Category:20th century]]
 +
[[Category:Policing]]
  
−
Police began to bring youth to the center instead of prosecuting them, and the massive street sweeps that had been a hallmark on the street since 1977 were no longer politically feasible for the City and merchants.
 
  
−
This activity overlapped with Tenderloin housing activism in the Tenderloin, which might well have disappeared in the late 1970s when it risked being swallowed by the expanding downtown Financial District and tourist industries. In the 1980s, influenced by Tenderloin activism, San Francisco passed a moratorium on the conversion of residential hotel units to tourist or commercial use, required luxury hoteliers to contribute millions of dollars in community mitigations, downzoned dozens of blocks of prime downtown property, and experienced a nonprofit housing boom.
+
<div style="text-align: right; direction: ltr; margin-left: 1em;">• Go to [[Police_sweeps_to_social_service | Next Article]]</div>

Latest revision as of 10:23, 8 May 2009

Text by Joey Plaster. Copyright (©) by C. Joey Plaster, 2009. All rights reserved.


Polk Gulch merchants viewed this influx with alarm. While intergenerational and commercial sex had long been a part of the culture, and merchants hired attractive youth to bartend and wait tables, they perceived the movement of “trade” hustling to the street as a threat to their economy.

Polk Street scene, 1977. Courtesy of the GLBTHS, Crawford Barton collection.

They responded by calling on what were now strong connections with City Hall. In 1977, merchants met with Mayor Moscone to complain about the “teen-age prostitutes, drug addicts and shoplifters are turning Polk Street into a nightmare – ‘the Haight Ashbury of the ‘70s.’” The president of the Polk Street Merchant’s Association said, “old ladies with white gloves aren’t shopping on Polk Street anymore.”[1]


The owner of the Town Squire complained that “street youth, many of them gay hustlers,” called women entering his store “the filthiest names you’ve ever heard.”[2] The owner of one restaurant said he was closing his business after his window was shattered yesterday for the fifth time in two years. “People are afraid of the punks,” he said. “They’re dangerous.”[3]


The Mayor responded with a sustained police sweep, for which hundreds of merchants congratulated the Northern Station in a lavish formal ceremony at the P.S. Lounge, including Mayor Moscone and the police chief, for “removing the criminal element from our streets.”


These included prostitutes, drug dealers, and panhandlers “believed to be displaced…from the Market Street and Tenderloin areas where successful police efforts were making it difficult for these would-be lawbreakers,” said the president of the association, an owner of a liquor store. “Today, these officers continue to patrol the streets of our area insuring that the criminal element does not attempt once again to move in.” The association president framed the sweep as a gay rights victory: it “enabled all residents to pursue their lifestyles peacefully and successfully,” he said.[4]


Others framed the sweep as a curtailment of civil liberties that ran counter to gay rights struggles. One newsletter complained of “Anita Bryant’s Vagrancy Law:” “Now you can get busted for ‘standing’, ‘sitting’, or even ‘being’ in private doorways or on your street!,” it read, noting that City Hall ordered the sweeps just before the November city election.[5] In early 1978, the ACLU noted “numerous complaints…that the [loitering] ordinance has been extensively used by the police as a means to harass come Gays on Polk Street.”[6]


Merchants won several large-scale police sweeps from 1977 to 1981, as they sought to eject the displaced population, while activists and citizens continued to complain of indiscriminate checks by police, citations for jaywalking, police harassment, and in some cases abuse.


The late 1970s saw the Polk gay business community at their economic and political peak. San Francisco saw its first district-based elections in November 1977, after which the sources of power that had drawn from downtown citywide base, including downtown business and labor, “found their influence strongly reduced, while neighborhood groups grew in power.”[7]


“The Polk Street Merchants Association was always very powerful politically,” Friday said. Polk Street “could make or break some local politicians….This is a small town. If you want to run for supervisor especially in a district…you’re naturally going to kiss ass to the merchants in the community, cause the merchants have the money.”[8]


Between August and September 1981, Mayor Feinstein ordered a massive, sustained police sweep on Polk Street at the behest of merchant association members concerned about the number of street youth on the street impinging on their business. Police made 449 arrests on Polk Street. But the aftermath of these sweeps, the result of a number of economic and political convergences, would result in a significant change for the neighborhood as the city shifted their approach to managing street youth.

  1. ↑ “Polk St. a jungle, merchants gripe,” San Francisco Examiner, Sept. 30, 1977, p. 4 c. 1
  2. ↑ Ibid.
  3. ↑ “Polk Street’s ‘punks’ anger merchants,” San Francisco Chronicle, Sept 30, 1977, p. 3 c. 1
  4. ↑ “Police Honored By Polk Area Merchants,” Bay Area Reporter, 1/19/78.
  5. ↑ “Repeal Anita Bryant’s New Vagrancy Law in S.F.,” Polk Street News No. 2, Sept. 1977.
  6. ↑ “Polk Harassment? ACLU Protests New Loitering Law,” Bay Area Reporter, 3/2/78.
  7. ↑ Hartman, City for Sale, 234.
  8. ↑ Interview with Wayne Friday by Joey Plaster, 2008.


PROTECTED ENTRY: This entry by a named creator or site administrator can be changed only by that creator and site administrators, so they are responsible for its accuracy, coverage, evidence, and clarity. Please do use this entry's Comment section at the bottom of the page to suggest improvements. Thanks.


• Go to Next Article
Retrieved from "https://wiki.outhistory.org/index.php?title=Polk_Street_Merchants_Push_Back&oldid=18107"