Difference between revisions of "New York Times: "homosexual," "heterosexual," June 24, 1923"

From OutHistory
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
by Jonathan Ned Katz
 
by Jonathan Ned Katz
  
Copyright (c) by Jonathan Ned Katz, 2008. All rights reserved.
 
 
{{Protected}}
 
  
 
In a survey in the ''New York Times Book Review'' of recent fiction, Wilson Follett says that some authors, "advanced sophisticates, poke fun at the canons of the intellectual smart set." He adds that Douglas Goldring, in "Nobody Knows" (Small, Maynard) "bludgeons the intelligensia in this wise:"
 
In a survey in the ''New York Times Book Review'' of recent fiction, Wilson Follett says that some authors, "advanced sophisticates, poke fun at the canons of the intellectual smart set." He adds that Douglas Goldring, in "Nobody Knows" (Small, Maynard) "bludgeons the intelligensia in this wise:"
Line 20: Line 17:
 
For the first use in the ''Times'' of the terms "homosexuals" and "heterosexuals" see.....  For the first use in the ''Times'' of the terms "homosexuality" and "heterosexuality" see ......
 
For the first use in the ''Times'' of the terms "homosexuals" and "heterosexuals" see.....  For the first use in the ''Times'' of the terms "homosexuality" and "heterosexuality" see ......
  
 +
 +
Copyright (c) by Jonathan Ned Katz, 2008. All rights reserved.
 +
 +
{{Protected}}
  
  

Revision as of 15:02, 24 February 2010

Smart Talk from the "Smart Set"

by Jonathan Ned Katz


In a survey in the New York Times Book Review of recent fiction, Wilson Follett says that some authors, "advanced sophisticates, poke fun at the canons of the intellectual smart set." He adds that Douglas Goldring, in "Nobody Knows" (Small, Maynard) "bludgeons the intelligensia in this wise:"

Miss Kate Crocker . . , unless she used the words "sublimate," "libido," "Wasserman test," "homosexual," "heterosexual," "orgasm," and "birth control," so many times in every hour . . . became irritable and discontented like a dipsomaniac when the pubs are closed.[1]


This is the first use of the word "heterosexual" and the second use of the word "homosexual" in The New York Times.[2]


The word "homosexual" was first used in the Times in 1914, in an essay written for the Times by George Bernard Shaw. See: [New York Times: "homosexual," November 22, 1914][3]


For the first use in the Times of the terms "homosexuals" and "heterosexuals" see..... For the first use in the Times of the terms "homosexuality" and "heterosexuality" see ......


Copyright (c) by Jonathan Ned Katz, 2008. All rights reserved.

PROTECTED ENTRY: This entry by a named creator or site administrator can be changed only by that creator and site administrators, so they are responsible for its accuracy, coverage, evidence, and clarity. Please do use this entry's Comment section at the bottom of the page to suggest improvements. Thanks.


References

  1. Wilson Follett, "down The Sooty Fiction Chimney: Novels Since January in a Brief survey -- Confusion of tendencies -- The Favorite Themes," New York Times Book Review, June 24, 1923, pp. 24-27.
  2. Search of New York Times electronic archive 1851-1980.
  3. George Bernard Shaw, "Common Sense About the War: An Amazing Article Written for The New York Times (Second Installment)," New York Times, November 22, 1914.


Categories