Difference between revisions of "BEFORE STONEWALL: WHAT MADE BLOOMINGTON A GAY OASIS?"
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
[[Fundamentalist Christianity]] | [[Fundamentalist Christianity]] | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[Heteronormative Gender Policing]] |
===Positive Attractions=== | ===Positive Attractions=== | ||
Revision as of 19:33, 28 March 2010
BEFORE STONEWALL
Bloomington is a small place compared to major coastal cities, but as the 7th largest population center in Indiana, and the largest town in the overwhelmingly rural south-central portion of the state, it functions in many ways as an urban area, with a population that is much more diverse and internationally-derived than the surrounding area. In other regards, it remains typically rural. In spite of the town’s relative diversity, its population is drawn largely from a racially and ethnically homogeneous (white) hinterland dominated by evangelical Christian values, and it is relatively isolated from coastal cultural influences. All of these “push” and “pull” factors, combined with the region’s history and demography, converge to shape the parameters within which Bloomington’s LGBT community has taken shape over the past half-century.
Negative Pressures
The formation of Bloomington’s LGBT community over the second half of the 20th century cannot be separated from the broader and deeper history of the area. Its demographic composition has been shaped over the long term by a history of ethnic cleansing, genocide, and slavery. The social regulation of white gender variance and homosexuality is linked to this history of racism through the logic and practice of eugenics, as well as through the terror of white supremacist groups such as the KKK, condemnatory beliefs of fundamentalist evangelical Christianity, and the xenophobia that sometimes characterizes geographically isolated populations.
Third-Gender Roles in Indiana-Area Native Americans
Heteronormative Gender Policing
Positive Attractions
In conjunction with the “negative” social forces that erase or expel those whose forms of love, structures of desire, and expressions of gender differ from the dominant culture, college town life has long attracted queer folks to Bloomington, even though the town itself remains bifurcated by the same forms of social oppression that operate more hegemonically in its environs. Some of the “positive” attraction of Bloomington lies simply in the promise of social and geographical mobility associated with access to higher education, and in the looser social norms that characterize most sectors of the town’s cultural life. But some of the positive attractions of Bloomington, particularly its arts culture and its reputation for frank tolerance of sexual diversity, can be attributed to the influence of two men, Herman B Wells and Alfred Kinsey.
The Indiana University Board of Aeons Bathroom Entrapment Scandal
