Difference between revisions of "History of the Term "Heterosexual""

From OutHistory
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: ==A chronology of the term heterosexual== '''1868, May 6:''' Kertbeny: "Homosexual," "Heterosexual" '''1880:''' [[Jäger: "Het...)
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==A chronology of the term heterosexual==
 
==A chronology of the term heterosexual==
 
+
<br/>
 
 
 
'''1868, May 6:''' [[Kertbeny: "Homosexual," "Heterosexual," May 6, 1868| Kertbeny: "Homosexual," "Heterosexual"]]  
 
'''1868, May 6:''' [[Kertbeny: "Homosexual," "Heterosexual," May 6, 1868| Kertbeny: "Homosexual," "Heterosexual"]]  
  
Line 15: Line 14:
  
 
'''1923, June 24:''' [[New York Times: "homosexual," "heterosexual," June 24, 1923| ''New York Time''s: "homosexual," "heterosexual"]]
 
'''1923, June 24:''' [[New York Times: "homosexual," "heterosexual," June 24, 1923| ''New York Time''s: "homosexual," "heterosexual"]]
 +
__noTOC__
 +
 +
==See also:==
 +
 +
==[[History of the Term "Homosexual"]]==
 +
 +
 +
==[[History of the Term "Lesbian"]]==
 +
 +
 +
==Questions==
 +
Why does the history of the term "heterosexual" matter?  Does it?
  
  
See also: [[History of the Term "Homosexual"| History of the Term "Homosexual"]]
+
In ''The Invention of Heterosexuality'', Jonathan Ned Katz argues that the invention and distribution of the terms "heterosexual' and "homosexual" caught on in the early 20th century because they were well equipped to express and further a middle-class supported fundamental change in the social-historical organization of sexual behavior, desire, and identity. This was the change from a fundamentally procreative order to a sex-gender system organized around male-female sexual pleasure, gender propriety, and a married man and woman. He argues that the distribution of the terms both reflected and helped to usher in and consolidate the 20th-century system of heterosexual supremacy and homosexual domination that was seriously challenged by the rebirth of the feminist movement in the 1960s, and the gay and lesbian movements after 1969.  What do you think of that argument?

Latest revision as of 11:45, 29 August 2011

A chronology of the term heterosexual


1868, May 6: Kertbeny: "Homosexual," "Heterosexual"


1880: Jäger: "Heterosexual"


1889: Krafft-Ebing: "Heterosexual"


1892, May: Kiernan: "Heterosexual," "Homosexual"


1923, June 24: New York Times: "homosexual," "heterosexual"


See also:

History of the Term "Homosexual"

History of the Term "Lesbian"

Questions

Why does the history of the term "heterosexual" matter? Does it?


In The Invention of Heterosexuality, Jonathan Ned Katz argues that the invention and distribution of the terms "heterosexual' and "homosexual" caught on in the early 20th century because they were well equipped to express and further a middle-class supported fundamental change in the social-historical organization of sexual behavior, desire, and identity. This was the change from a fundamentally procreative order to a sex-gender system organized around male-female sexual pleasure, gender propriety, and a married man and woman. He argues that the distribution of the terms both reflected and helped to usher in and consolidate the 20th-century system of heterosexual supremacy and homosexual domination that was seriously challenged by the rebirth of the feminist movement in the 1960s, and the gay and lesbian movements after 1969. What do you think of that argument?