Difference between revisions of "Buggery law: Massachusetts, May 26, 1697"

From OutHistory
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Protected "Buggery law: Massachusetts, May 26, 1697" [edit=sysop:move=sysop])
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
After the Massachusetts Bay and the Plymouth colonies were joined as the Massachusetts
+
==Death for "buggery"==
Colony, a revision of the old Massachusetts Bay law, of 1672, made a
 
terminological change in the new sodomy statute.<ref> 1697, May 26: Massachusetts "buggery" law; Acts and Laws, Passed by the Great and General Council or Assembly of the Province of Massachusetts-Bay in New England from1692, to 1719 (London: J. Baskett, 1724), p. 110. Additional information on this law in Samuel Sewall, The Diary of, .. , edited by M. Halsey Thomas, 2 vols., (New York: Farrar,
 
Straus & Giroux, 1973), vol. I, p. 380. For the revision of 1785 see Perpetual
 
Laws of. . . Massachusetts Up to 1789 (Boston: Adams and Nourse, 1789), p.
 
178.</ref> The crime was now called "buggery" with men or beast; it was still "detestable and abominable" but it was now also "contrary to the very Light of Nature" (hinting that "Nature" was playing a new, prominent role in legal philosophy). Unlike most earlier laws in which sodomy was distinguished from bestiality, the term "buggery" here applied to both kinds of contacts. And both still remained capital crimes.
 
  
 +
{{Protected}}
 +
After the Massachusetts Bay and the Plymouth colonies were joined as the Massachusetts Colony, a revision of the old Massachusetts Bay law of 1672 made a terminological change in the new sodomy statute. The crime was now called "buggery" with man or beast. It was still "detestable and abominable" but it was now also "contrary to the very Light of Nature" (hinting that "Nature" was playing a new, prominent role in legal philosophy). Unlike most earlier laws in which sodomy was distinguished from bestiality, the term "buggery" here applied to both kinds of contacts. And both still remained capital crimes.
 +
<ref>{{GLA}}, p. 121-22, citing ''Acts and Laws, Passed by the Great and General Council or Assembly of the Province of Massachusetts-Bay in New England from 1692, to 1719'' (London: J. Baskett, 1724), p. 110. Additional information on this law in Samuel Sewall, ''The Diary of . . . '' edited by M. Halsey Thomas, 2 vols. (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1973), vol. I, p. 380.</ref>
  
This Massachusetts "buggery" law, requiring death for the human participants
+
and, in the case of bestiality, the execution and burning of the beast, was
+
This Massachusetts "buggery" law, requiring death for the human participants and, in the case of bestiality, the execution and burning of the beast, was one of a series of provisions which also included acts against murder, rape, and "Atheism and Blasphemie" (the latter punished by "boring through the tongue with a red hot iron").
one of a series of provisions which also included acts against murder, rape, and
 
"Atheism and Blasphemie" (the latter punished by "boring through the tongue
 
with a red hot iron").
 
  
  
 
"An Act for the Punishment of Buggery" read:
 
"An Act for the Punishment of Buggery" read:
<blockquote>For avoiding of the detestable and abominable Sin of Buggery with Mankindor Beast, which is contrary to the very Light of Nature; Be it Enacted and
+
<blockquote>For avoiding of the detestable and abominable Sin of Buggery with Mankind or Beast, which is contrary to the very Light of Nature; Be it Enacted and Declared ... That the same Offence be adjudged Felony.... And that every Man, being duly convicted of lying with Mankind, as he lieth with a Woman; and every Man or Woman that shall have carnal Copulation with any Beast or Brute Creature, the Offender and Offenders, in either of the Cases before
Declared ... That the same Offence be adjudged Felony.... And that every
+
mentioned, shall suffer the Pains of Death, and the Beast shall be slain and burnt.</blockquote>
Man, being duly convicted of lying with Mankind, as he lieth with a Woman;
 
and every Man or Woman that shall have carnal Copulation with any Beast
 
or Brute Creature, the Offender and Offenders, in either of the Cases before
 
mentioned, shall suffer the Pains of Death, and the Beast shall be slain and
 
burnt.</blockquote>
 
  
  
This law remained in force until its revision in 1785. A law of 1805 abolished the
+
This law remained in force until its revision in 1785.<ref>''Perpetual Laws of. . . Massachusetts Up to 1789'' (Boston: Adams and Nourse, 1789), p. 178.</ref>
death penalty for "Sodomy and Bestiality."
+
 
 +
 
 +
A law of 1805 abolished the death penalty for "Sodomy and Bestiality."
  
  
Line 34: Line 26:
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
 
{{GLA}} p. 121-2.
 
  
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
Line 43: Line 33:
  
 
[[Category:The Age of Sodomitical Sin]]
 
[[Category:The Age of Sodomitical Sin]]
[[Category:American Colonial Era (1607-1776)]]
+
[[Category:Colonizing and Settling, 1585-1763]]
[[Category:1690-1699]]
 
[[Category:17th century]]
 
 
[[Category:Sodomy]]
 
[[Category:Sodomy]]
 
[[Category:Buggery]]
 
[[Category:Buggery]]
 
 
[[Category:Buggery Law]]
 
[[Category:Buggery Law]]
 +
[[Category:Massachusetts]]
 
[[Category:Massachusetts Colony]]
 
[[Category:Massachusetts Colony]]
[[Category:Massachusetts]]
+
[[Category:1690-1699]]
 +
[[Category:17th century]]

Latest revision as of 11:20, 15 July 2008

Death for "buggery"

PROTECTED ENTRY: This entry by a named creator or site administrator can be changed only by that creator and site administrators, so they are responsible for its accuracy, coverage, evidence, and clarity. Please do use this entry's Comment section at the bottom of the page to suggest improvements. Thanks.

After the Massachusetts Bay and the Plymouth colonies were joined as the Massachusetts Colony, a revision of the old Massachusetts Bay law of 1672 made a terminological change in the new sodomy statute. The crime was now called "buggery" with man or beast. It was still "detestable and abominable" but it was now also "contrary to the very Light of Nature" (hinting that "Nature" was playing a new, prominent role in legal philosophy). Unlike most earlier laws in which sodomy was distinguished from bestiality, the term "buggery" here applied to both kinds of contacts. And both still remained capital crimes. [1]


This Massachusetts "buggery" law, requiring death for the human participants and, in the case of bestiality, the execution and burning of the beast, was one of a series of provisions which also included acts against murder, rape, and "Atheism and Blasphemie" (the latter punished by "boring through the tongue with a red hot iron").


"An Act for the Punishment of Buggery" read:

For avoiding of the detestable and abominable Sin of Buggery with Mankind or Beast, which is contrary to the very Light of Nature; Be it Enacted and Declared ... That the same Offence be adjudged Felony.... And that every Man, being duly convicted of lying with Mankind, as he lieth with a Woman; and every Man or Woman that shall have carnal Copulation with any Beast or Brute Creature, the Offender and Offenders, in either of the Cases before mentioned, shall suffer the Pains of Death, and the Beast shall be slain and burnt.


This law remained in force until its revision in 1785.[2]


A law of 1805 abolished the death penalty for "Sodomy and Bestiality."


Return to Age of Sodomitical Sin index • Go to next article


References

  1. Jonathan Ned Katz, Gay/Lesbian Almanac (NY: Harper & Row, 1983), p. 121-22, citing Acts and Laws, Passed by the Great and General Council or Assembly of the Province of Massachusetts-Bay in New England from 1692, to 1719 (London: J. Baskett, 1724), p. 110. Additional information on this law in Samuel Sewall, The Diary of . . . edited by M. Halsey Thomas, 2 vols. (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1973), vol. I, p. 380.
  2. Perpetual Laws of. . . Massachusetts Up to 1789 (Boston: Adams and Nourse, 1789), p. 178.


This entry is part of the featured exhibit Colonial America: The Age of Sodomitical Sin curated by Jonathan Ned Katz. As it is content created by a named author, editor, or curator, it is not open to editing by the general public. But we strongly encourage you to discuss the content or propose edits on the discussion page, and the author, editor, or curator will make any changes that improve the entry or its content. Thanks.