Difference between revisions of "JulberAppeal"
From OutHistory
Jump to navigationJump to searchm |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<div style="text-align: center;"> | <div style="text-align: center;"> | ||
| − | IN THE | + | IN THE<br> |
| − | UNITED STATES COURT OF | + | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS<br> |
| − | FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT | + | FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT<br> |
| − | ONE, INCORPORATED, a corporation, | + | ONE, INCORPORATED, a corporation,<br> |
Appellant, | Appellant, | ||
vs. | vs. | ||
| − | OTTO K. OLESEN, individually and | + | OTTO K. OLESEN, individually and <br> |
| − | as Postmaster of the City of Los | + | as Postmaster of the City of Los Angeles, |
| − | Angeles, | ||
Appellee. | Appellee. | ||
| Line 28: | Line 27: | ||
Beverly Hills, California | Beverly Hills, California | ||
| − | Attorney for | + | Attorney for Appellant |
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 36: | Line 35: | ||
No. 15139 | No. 15139 | ||
| − | IN THE | + | IN THE <br> |
| − | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS | + | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS <br> |
| − | FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT | + | FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT <br> |
</div> | </div> | ||
| + | <div style="text-align: left; direction: ltr; margin-left: 1em;"> | ||
ONE, INCORPORATED, <br> | ONE, INCORPORATED, <br> | ||
| − | a corporation, | + | a corporation, |
| + | </div> | ||
<div style="text-align: right; direction: ltr; margin-left: 1em;"> | <div style="text-align: right; direction: ltr; margin-left: 1em;"> | ||
| − | |||
Appellent,</div> | Appellent,</div> | ||
| + | <div style="text-align: left; direction: ltr; margin-left: 1em;"> | ||
vs. | vs. | ||
| − | OTTO K. OLESEN, individually and | + | OTTO K. OLESEN, individually and <br> |
As Postmaster or the City of Los Angeles, | As Postmaster or the City of Los Angeles, | ||
| + | </div> | ||
<div style="text-align: right; direction: ltr; margin-left: 1em;"> | <div style="text-align: right; direction: ltr; margin-left: 1em;"> | ||
Latest revision as of 20:06, 17 November 2009
IN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ONE, INCORPORATED, a corporation,
Appellant,
vs.
OTTO K. OLESEN, individually and
as Postmaster of the City of Los Angeles,
Appellee.
APPELLANT’S OPENING BRIEF
ERIC JULBER
333 S. Beverly Drive
Beverly Hills, California
Attorney for Appellant
No. 15139
IN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ONE, INCORPORATED,
a corporation,
Appellent,
vs.
OTTO K. OLESEN, individually and
As Postmaster or the City of Los Angeles,
Appellee.
APPELLANT’S OPENING BRIEF
Text by C. Todd White. Copyright (©) by C. Todd White, 2008. All rights reserved.
Back to Exhibit Main Page • Back to Historical Documents Index
PROTECTED ENTRY: This entry by a named creator or site administrator can be changed only by that creator and site administrators, so they are responsible for its accuracy, coverage, evidence, and clarity. Please do use this entry's Comment section at the bottom of the page to suggest improvements. Thanks.
