Difference between revisions of "Legal case: Michell and Preston; Plymouth, March 1, 1642"

From OutHistory
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: == "Lewd & sodomitical practices" == The Plymouth court cited Edward Michell and Edward Preston for "lewd & sodomitical practices tending to sodomy" with each other.<ref>{{GLA}}, pp. 84-...)
 
m
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
<blockquote>Lydia Hatch, for suffering Edward Michell to attempt to abuse her body by uncleanness, & did not discover [report] it, & [for] lying in the same bed with her brother, Jonathan, is censured to be publicly whipped; was accordingly done.</blockquote>
 
<blockquote>Lydia Hatch, for suffering Edward Michell to attempt to abuse her body by uncleanness, & did not discover [report] it, & [for] lying in the same bed with her brother, Jonathan, is censured to be publicly whipped; was accordingly done.</blockquote>
 +
 +
 +
<div style="text-align: right; direction: ltr; margin-left: 1em;">
 +
Return to [[Colonial America: The Age of Sodomitical Sin|Age of Sodomitical Sin]] index • Go to [[Sodomy law: Connecticut, December 1, 1642|next article]]
 +
</div>
 +
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
Line 24: Line 30:
  
 
[[Category:The Age of Sodomitical Sin]]
 
[[Category:The Age of Sodomitical Sin]]
 +
[[Category:Colonizing and Settling, 1585-1763]]
 +
[[Category:1640-1649]]
 +
[[Category:17th century]]
 +
[[Category:Sodomy]]
 +
[[Category:Law]]
 +
[[Category:Plymouth Colony]]
 +
[[Category:Massachusetts]]
 +
[[Category:Michell, Edward]]
 +
[[Category:Preston, Edward]]
 +
[[Category:Sodomy Law]]
 +
[[Category:Legal cases]]
 +
[[Category:Research Requests]]

Latest revision as of 19:47, 14 April 2009

"Lewd & sodomitical practices"

The Plymouth court cited Edward Michell and Edward Preston for "lewd & sodomitical practices tending to sodomy" with each other.[1]


Conviction under the Plymouth sodomy law of 1636 meant death, but these guilty parties were only whipped. The court, then, made a major distinction between "sodomy" proper, punished by death, and "sodomitical" (or sodomy-like) practices-those "tending toward sodomy"-- punished by a whipping. The record states:

Edward Michell, for his lewd & sodomitical practices tending to sodomy with Edward Preston, and other lewd carriages with Lydia Hatch, is censured to be presently whipped at Plymouth, at the public place, and once more at Barnestable, in convenient time, in the presence of Mr. Freeman and the committees of the said town.

Edward Preston, for his lewd practices tending to sodomy with Edward Michell, and pressing John Keene thereunto (if he would have yielded), is also censured [sentenced] to be forthwith whipped at Plymouth, and once more at Barnestable (when Edward Michell is whipped), in the presence of Mr. Freeman & the committees of the same town.

John Keene, because he resisted the temptation, & used means to discover it, is appointed to stand by whilst Michell and Preston are whipped, though in some thing he was faulty.

The same court proceeding also cited

Lydia Hatch, for suffering Edward Michell to attempt to abuse her body by uncleanness, & did not discover [report] it, & [for] lying in the same bed with her brother, Jonathan, is censured to be publicly whipped; was accordingly done.


Return to Age of Sodomitical Sin index • Go to next article


References

  1. Jonathan Ned Katz, Gay/Lesbian Almanac (NY: Harper & Row, 1983), pp. 84-85, citing Shurtleff, Plymouth, [Research Request: full name, title, place of pub, publisher, year of pub?] vol 2, pp. 35-36. These records also report that Jonathan Hatch was arrested as a "vagrant" and for his "misdemeanors" with his sister, sentenced to be whipped and sent to Salem. The proceedings of the same date also cite "Tristam Hull, of Yarmouth, for unclean practices" (unspecified). Hull's citation did not prevent him from being elected constable of Yarmouth six years later, in 1647 (vol. 2, p. 115).


This entry is part of the featured exhibit Colonial America: The Age of Sodomitical Sin curated by Jonathan Ned Katz. As it is content created by a named author, editor, or curator, it is not open to editing by the general public. But we strongly encourage you to discuss the content or propose edits on the discussion page, and the author, editor, or curator will make any changes that improve the entry or its content. Thanks.