Difference between revisions of "Legal case: Allexander, Roberts; Plymouth, August 6, 1637"

From OutHistory
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: == "Lewd behavior and unclean carriage" == The Plymouth court found John Allexander and Thomas Roberts guilty of "often spending their seed one upon the other."<ref>{{GLA}}, pp. 75, citin...)
 
m
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== "Lewd behavior and unclean carriage" ==
 
== "Lewd behavior and unclean carriage" ==
  
The Plymouth court found John Allexander and Thomas Roberts guilty of "often spending their seed one upon the other."<ref>{{GLA}}, pp. 75, citing Nathaniel B. Shurtleff and David Pulsifer, eds., ''Records of theColony of New Plymouth'' (Boston: William White. 1855). vol. I. p. 64. For charge of Oct. 2. 1637: same. vol. I. p. 68. For
+
 
 +
The Plymouth court found John Allexander and Thomas Roberts guilty of "often spending their seed one upon the other."<ref>{{GLA}}, pp. 75, citing Nathaniel B. Shurtleff and David Pulsifer, eds., ''Records of the Colony of New Plymouth'' (Boston: William White. 1855). vol. I. p. 64. For charge of Oct. 2. 1637: same. vol. I. p. 68. For
 
charge of Jan. 5. 1642: same, vol. 2. p. 6.</ref> The Plymouth crime of "sodomy" was not mentioned in connection with the case, for "sodomy," then, required "penetration,"not mere emission, even if this emission was mutual, and "often."  
 
charge of Jan. 5. 1642: same, vol. 2. p. 6.</ref> The Plymouth crime of "sodomy" was not mentioned in connection with the case, for "sodomy," then, required "penetration,"not mere emission, even if this emission was mutual, and "often."  
  
Line 7: Line 8:
 
The class difference of the parties was also suggested; Allexander, presented as the instigator, was apparently a free man, Roberts an indentured servant. Whether this intermingling of social orders, as well as of seed, lent gravity to the crime in the eyes of the judges was not disclosed. The record states:
 
The class difference of the parties was also suggested; Allexander, presented as the instigator, was apparently a free man, Roberts an indentured servant. Whether this intermingling of social orders, as well as of seed, lent gravity to the crime in the eyes of the judges was not disclosed. The record states:
  
<blockquote>John Allexander & Thomas Roberts were both examined and found guilty of lewd behavior and unclean carriage one with another, by often spending their seed one upon another, which was proved both by witness & their own confession; the said Allexander [was] found to have been formerly notoriously guilty that way, and seeking to allure others thereunto. The said John Allexander was therefore censured [sentenced] by the Court to be severely whipped, and burnt in the shoulder with a hot iron, and to be perpetually banished [from] the government [territory] of New Plymouth, and if he be at any time found within the same, to be whipped out again by the appointment [order] of the next justice, etc., and so as oft as he shall be found within this government. Which penalty was accordingly inflicted. Thomas Roberts was censured to be severely whipped, and to return to his master, Mr. Atwood, and serve out his time with him, but to be disabled hereby to enjoy any lands within this government, except he manifest better desert</blockquote>
+
<blockquote>John Allexander & Thomas Roberts were both examined and found guilty of lewd behavior and unclean carriage one with another, by often spending their seed one upon another, which was proved both by witness & their own confession; the said Allexander [was] found to have been formerly notoriously guilty that way, and seeking to allure others thereunto. The said John Allexander was therefore censured [sentenced] by the Court to be severely whipped, and burnt in the shoulder with a hot iron, and to be perpetually banished [from] the government [territory] of New Plymouth, and if he be at any time found within the same, to be whipped out again by the appointment [order] of the next justice, etc., and so as oft as he shall be found within this government. Which penalty was accordingly inflicted.  
 +
 
 +
Thomas Roberts was censured to be severely whipped, and to return to his master, Mr. Atwood, and serve out his time with him, but to be disabled hereby to enjoy any lands within this government, except he manifest better desert</blockquote>
  
 
The last five qualifying words were added, as an afterthought, in the margin.
 
The last five qualifying words were added, as an afterthought, in the margin.
Line 18: Line 21:
  
 
<blockquote>Thomas Roberts, of Duxborrow, is ordered by the Court that he shall lodge no more with George Morrey, a diseased person, and betwixt this and the next Court of Assistants provide himself of lodging; and then make report to the Court how it may be probable he may live without being chargeable.</blockquote>
 
<blockquote>Thomas Roberts, of Duxborrow, is ordered by the Court that he shall lodge no more with George Morrey, a diseased person, and betwixt this and the next Court of Assistants provide himself of lodging; and then make report to the Court how it may be probable he may live without being chargeable.</blockquote>
 +
 +
 +
<div style="text-align: right; direction: ltr; margin-left: 1em;">
 +
Return to [[Colonial America: The Age of Sodomitical Sin|Age of Sodomitical Sin]] index • Go to [[Thomas Shepard: heart sodomy, 1641|next article]]
 +
</div>
  
  
Line 26: Line 34:
 
{{Curated Exhibit|exhibit name and link=[[Colonial America: The Age of Sodomitical Sin|Colonial America: The Age of Sodomitical Sin]]|firstname=Jonathan Ned|lastname=Katz}}
 
{{Curated Exhibit|exhibit name and link=[[Colonial America: The Age of Sodomitical Sin|Colonial America: The Age of Sodomitical Sin]]|firstname=Jonathan Ned|lastname=Katz}}
  
 +
 +
==Categories==
 
[[Category:The Age of Sodomitical Sin]]
 
[[Category:The Age of Sodomitical Sin]]
 +
[[Category:Allexander, John]]
 +
[[Category:Colonizing and Settling, 1585-1763]]
 +
[[Category:Law]]
 +
[[Category:Legal cases]]
 +
[[Category:Massachusetts]]
 +
[[Category:Plymouth Colony]]
 +
[[Category:Roberts, Thomas]]
 +
[[Category:Servants]]
 +
[[Category:Sodomy]]
 +
[[Category:Sodomy Law]]
 +
[[Category:1630-1639]]
 +
[[Category:17th century]]

Latest revision as of 18:56, 14 April 2009

"Lewd behavior and unclean carriage"

The Plymouth court found John Allexander and Thomas Roberts guilty of "often spending their seed one upon the other."[1] The Plymouth crime of "sodomy" was not mentioned in connection with the case, for "sodomy," then, required "penetration,"not mere emission, even if this emission was mutual, and "often."


The class difference of the parties was also suggested; Allexander, presented as the instigator, was apparently a free man, Roberts an indentured servant. Whether this intermingling of social orders, as well as of seed, lent gravity to the crime in the eyes of the judges was not disclosed. The record states:

John Allexander & Thomas Roberts were both examined and found guilty of lewd behavior and unclean carriage one with another, by often spending their seed one upon another, which was proved both by witness & their own confession; the said Allexander [was] found to have been formerly notoriously guilty that way, and seeking to allure others thereunto. The said John Allexander was therefore censured [sentenced] by the Court to be severely whipped, and burnt in the shoulder with a hot iron, and to be perpetually banished [from] the government [territory] of New Plymouth, and if he be at any time found within the same, to be whipped out again by the appointment [order] of the next justice, etc., and so as oft as he shall be found within this government. Which penalty was accordingly inflicted. Thomas Roberts was censured to be severely whipped, and to return to his master, Mr. Atwood, and serve out his time with him, but to be disabled hereby to enjoy any lands within this government, except he manifest better desert

The last five qualifying words were added, as an afterthought, in the margin.


On October 2, 1637, Thomas Roberts was one of four men charged by the Plymouth Court with "disorderly living, & therefore to be required to give an account how they live."


Four years later, on January 5, 1642, a "Thomas Roberts," possibly the same individual cited above, was mentioned in the Plymouth Court records:

Thomas Roberts, of Duxborrow, is ordered by the Court that he shall lodge no more with George Morrey, a diseased person, and betwixt this and the next Court of Assistants provide himself of lodging; and then make report to the Court how it may be probable he may live without being chargeable.


Return to Age of Sodomitical Sin index • Go to next article


References

  1. Jonathan Ned Katz, Gay/Lesbian Almanac (NY: Harper & Row, 1983), pp. 75, citing Nathaniel B. Shurtleff and David Pulsifer, eds., Records of the Colony of New Plymouth (Boston: William White. 1855). vol. I. p. 64. For charge of Oct. 2. 1637: same. vol. I. p. 68. For charge of Jan. 5. 1642: same, vol. 2. p. 6.


This entry is part of the featured exhibit Colonial America: The Age of Sodomitical Sin curated by Jonathan Ned Katz. As it is content created by a named author, editor, or curator, it is not open to editing by the general public. But we strongly encourage you to discuss the content or propose edits on the discussion page, and the author, editor, or curator will make any changes that improve the entry or its content. Thanks.


Categories