Difference between revisions of "Buggery law: New Hampshire, 1718"
From OutHistory
Jump to navigationJump to searchOutHistory (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | New Hampshire legislators revised its "buggery" law of 1680, adopting the Massachusetts law of 1697 with only minor changes. | + | == Death for buggery == |
| − | + | ||
| − | law, unlike that of Massachusetts, used the term "buggery" to refer to both | + | {{Protected}} |
| + | New Hampshire legislators revised its "buggery" law of 1680, adopting the [[Buggery law: Massachusetts, May 26, 1697|Massachusetts law of 1697]] with only minor changes. However, the New Hampshire law, unlike that of Massachusetts, used the term "buggery" to refer to both sodomy and bestiality.<ref>{{GLA}}, p. 131, citing Batchellor, vol. 2, p. 314.</ref> | ||
The statute read: | The statute read: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | <blockquote>for avoiding of the Detestable and Abominable Sin of Buggery with Mankind or Beast, which is contrary to the very light of Nature: Be it Enacted ... that the same offense be adjudged Felony. . . . And that every Man being duly convicted of Lying with Man-kind as he lyeth with a Woman; And every Man or Woman that shall have Carnal | ||
| + | Copulation with any Beast or brute Creature, the offender and offenders in either the cases before mentioned, shall suffer the pains of Death, and the Beast shall be slain and burned.</blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | This law was next revised in 1812, when New Hampshire legislators revoked the death penalty for this crime.<ref>Batchellor, vol. 8, p. 130.</ref> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | <div style="text-align: right; direction: ltr; margin-left: 1em;"> | ||
| + | Return to [[Colonial America: The Age of Sodomitical Sin|Age of Sodomitical Sin]] index • Go to [[Legal case: Clark v. Winn; North Carolina, March 1718|next article]] | ||
| + | </div> | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
| Line 28: | Line 26: | ||
[[Category:The Age of Sodomitical Sin]] | [[Category:The Age of Sodomitical Sin]] | ||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Colonizing and Settling, 1585-1763]] |
| + | [[Category:Buggery Law]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Law]] | ||
| + | [[Category:New Hampshire]] | ||
| + | [[Category:New Hampshire Colony]] | ||
[[Category:1710-1719]] | [[Category:1710-1719]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
[[Category:18th century]] | [[Category:18th century]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:17, 15 July 2008
Death for buggery
PROTECTED ENTRY: This entry by a named creator or site administrator can be changed only by that creator and site administrators, so they are responsible for its accuracy, coverage, evidence, and clarity. Please do use this entry's Comment section at the bottom of the page to suggest improvements. Thanks.
New Hampshire legislators revised its "buggery" law of 1680, adopting the Massachusetts law of 1697 with only minor changes. However, the New Hampshire law, unlike that of Massachusetts, used the term "buggery" to refer to both sodomy and bestiality.[1]
The statute read:
for avoiding of the Detestable and Abominable Sin of Buggery with Mankind or Beast, which is contrary to the very light of Nature: Be it Enacted ... that the same offense be adjudged Felony. . . . And that every Man being duly convicted of Lying with Man-kind as he lyeth with a Woman; And every Man or Woman that shall have Carnal Copulation with any Beast or brute Creature, the offender and offenders in either the cases before mentioned, shall suffer the pains of Death, and the Beast shall be slain and burned.
This law was next revised in 1812, when New Hampshire legislators revoked the death penalty for this crime.[2]
Return to Age of Sodomitical Sin index • Go to next article
References
This entry is part of the featured exhibit Colonial America: The Age of Sodomitical Sin curated by Jonathan Ned Katz. As it is content created by a named author, editor, or curator, it is not open to editing by the general public. But we strongly encourage you to discuss the content or propose edits on the discussion page, and the author, editor, or curator will make any changes that improve the entry or its content. Thanks.
