Difference between revisions of "JulberAppeal"
From OutHistory
Jump to navigationJump to searchm |
|||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
Beverly Hills, California | Beverly Hills, California | ||
| − | Attorney for | + | Attorney for Appellant |
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
<div style="text-align: right; direction: ltr; margin-left: 1em;"> | <div style="text-align: right; direction: ltr; margin-left: 1em;"> | ||
| − | |||
Appellent,</div> | Appellent,</div> | ||
Revision as of 20:05, 17 November 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPERALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ONE, INCORPORATED, a corporation, Appellant,
vs.
OTTO K. OLESEN, individually and as Postmaster of the City of Los Angeles,
Appellee.
APPELLANT’S OPENING BRIEF
ERIC JULBER
333 S. Beverly Drive
Beverly Hills, California
Attorney for Appellant
No. 15139
IN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ONE, INCORPORATED,
a corporation,
Appellent,
vs.
OTTO K. OLESEN, individually and
As Postmaster or the City of Los Angeles,
Appellee.
APPELLANT’S OPENING BRIEF
Text by C. Todd White. Copyright (©) by C. Todd White, 2008. All rights reserved.
Back to Exhibit Main Page • Back to Historical Documents Index
PROTECTED ENTRY: This entry by a named creator or site administrator can be changed only by that creator and site administrators, so they are responsible for its accuracy, coverage, evidence, and clarity. Please do use this entry's Comment section at the bottom of the page to suggest improvements. Thanks.
