Difference between revisions of "Buggery law: Massachusetts, May 26, 1697"
(New page: {{GLA}} p. 121-2. After the Massachusetts Bay and the Plymouth colonies were joined as the Massachusetts Colony, a revision of the old Massachusetts Bay law, of 1672, made a terminologica...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
After the Massachusetts Bay and the Plymouth colonies were joined as the Massachusetts | After the Massachusetts Bay and the Plymouth colonies were joined as the Massachusetts | ||
Colony, a revision of the old Massachusetts Bay law, of 1672, made a | Colony, a revision of the old Massachusetts Bay law, of 1672, made a | ||
| Line 25: | Line 23: | ||
This law remained in force until its revision in 1785. A law of 1805 abolished the | This law remained in force until its revision in 1785. A law of 1805 abolished the | ||
death penalty for "Sodomy and Bestiality." | death penalty for "Sodomy and Bestiality." | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <div style="text-align: right; direction: ltr; margin-left: 1em;"> | ||
| + | Return to [[Colonial America: The Age of Sodomitical Sin|Age of Sodomitical Sin]] index • Go to [[Sodomy law: Pennsylvania, November 27, 1700|next article]] | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
| + | {{GLA}} p. 121-2. | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
| Line 35: | Line 40: | ||
[[Category:The Age of Sodomitical Sin]] | [[Category:The Age of Sodomitical Sin]] | ||
| + | [[Category:American Colonial Era (1607-1776)]] | ||
| + | [[Category:1690-1699]] | ||
| + | [[Category:17th century]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Sodomy]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Buggery]] | ||
| − | + | [[Category:Buggery Law]] | |
| + | [[Category:Massachusetts Colony]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Massachusetts]] | ||
Revision as of 11:50, 25 April 2008
After the Massachusetts Bay and the Plymouth colonies were joined as the Massachusetts Colony, a revision of the old Massachusetts Bay law, of 1672, made a terminological change in the new sodomy statute.[1] The crime was now called "buggery" with men or beast; it was still "detestable and abominable" but it was now also "contrary to the very Light of Nature" (hinting that "Nature" was playing a new, prominent role in legal philosophy). Unlike most earlier laws in which sodomy was distinguished from bestiality, the term "buggery" here applied to both kinds of contacts. And both still remained capital crimes.
This Massachusetts "buggery" law, requiring death for the human participants and, in the case of bestiality, the execution and burning of the beast, was one of a series of provisions which also included acts against murder, rape, and "Atheism and Blasphemie" (the latter punished by "boring through the tongue with a red hot iron").
"An Act for the Punishment of Buggery" read:
For avoiding of the detestable and abominable Sin of Buggery with Mankindor Beast, which is contrary to the very Light of Nature; Be it Enacted and
Declared ... That the same Offence be adjudged Felony.... And that every Man, being duly convicted of lying with Mankind, as he lieth with a Woman; and every Man or Woman that shall have carnal Copulation with any Beast or Brute Creature, the Offender and Offenders, in either of the Cases before mentioned, shall suffer the Pains of Death, and the Beast shall be slain and
burnt.
This law remained in force until its revision in 1785. A law of 1805 abolished the death penalty for "Sodomy and Bestiality."
Return to Age of Sodomitical Sin index • Go to next article
References
Jonathan Ned Katz, Gay/Lesbian Almanac (NY: Harper & Row, 1983) p. 121-2.
- ↑ 1697, May 26: Massachusetts "buggery" law; Acts and Laws, Passed by the Great and General Council or Assembly of the Province of Massachusetts-Bay in New England from1692, to 1719 (London: J. Baskett, 1724), p. 110. Additional information on this law in Samuel Sewall, The Diary of, .. , edited by M. Halsey Thomas, 2 vols., (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1973), vol. I, p. 380. For the revision of 1785 see Perpetual Laws of. . . Massachusetts Up to 1789 (Boston: Adams and Nourse, 1789), p. 178.
