Difference between revisions of "Kevin McCarthy"

From OutHistory
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
Line 19: Line 19:
 
Elected March 1996
 
Elected March 1996
  
 
+
Reelected 2002
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
       </td>
 
       </td>
Line 29: Line 26:
  
  
== Interview with Kevin McCarthy from Out and Elected in the USA ==
+
Of Judge McCarthy's more novel cases was settling a dispute between two fans of Baseball player Barry Bonds.  The dispute was over ownership of the ball Bond hit to gaining his 73rd home run of the 2001 season.  McCarthy ordered the ball be sold and that they split the proceeds. The ball fetched $515,500.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
== Essay by Kevin McCarthy for ''Out and Elected in the USA'' ==
  
 
Officially, state judges in California are elected officials with six-year terms. Most judges who retire or are elevated leave office in the middle of their term. A seat left vacant mid term is filled by gubernatorial appointment. As a practical matter, therefore, almost all judges are selected by the governor.   
 
Officially, state judges in California are elected officials with six-year terms. Most judges who retire or are elevated leave office in the middle of their term. A seat left vacant mid term is filled by gubernatorial appointment. As a practical matter, therefore, almost all judges are selected by the governor.   

Revision as of 13:28, 29 May 2008

Kevin McCarthy. San Francisco Superior Court Judge. Photo by Ron Schlittler.


Kevin M. McCarthy

Born December 7, 1957

Superior Court Judge

San Francisco, California

725,000 constituents

Career Overview

Elected March 1996

Reelected 2002


Of Judge McCarthy's more novel cases was settling a dispute between two fans of Baseball player Barry Bonds. The dispute was over ownership of the ball Bond hit to gaining his 73rd home run of the 2001 season. McCarthy ordered the ball be sold and that they split the proceeds. The ball fetched $515,500.


Essay by Kevin McCarthy for Out and Elected in the USA

Officially, state judges in California are elected officials with six-year terms. Most judges who retire or are elevated leave office in the middle of their term. A seat left vacant mid term is filled by gubernatorial appointment. As a practical matter, therefore, almost all judges are selected by the governor.


From 1982 until the present, there has not been a single open gay or lesbian appointed to the bench in the entire state. At the time of my election, there were 1,555 judges statewide, five of whom were open gays and lesbians. The only route to the bench for us was by election.


I decided to challenge a sitting judge who had recently been appointed by the governor. In my campaign people often asked me why I was running for judge. Some were concerned that judicial elections threaten the independence of the judiciary, a concern that I share. Others were of the opinion that it was impossible to defeat a sitting judge. This was also a concern that I shared, only privately.


I always answered by saying that I considered the question to contain two parts. The first, and most important question, was: what qualified me to be a judge and why did I want the position? The second question was: why did I run instead of seeking appointment. I gave my answers to both questions at every political gathering in this very political city.


When I talked about why I was running, I pointed out that I had no other option. Lesbians and gay men had been unfairly excluded from the appointment process. If I didn't run, I would be acquiescing to the bigotry of the governor and his predecessor, and I could not do that in good conscience.


In the end, the response was overwhelming. I was endorsed by the San Francisco Chronicle, given the highest rating by the Bar Association of San Francisco, and I received the endorsement of most major political figures and organizations including the Democratic Party. In a campaign, which was run out of my home by myself and my former partner David Weldy, I won by a margin of seventy percent to thirty percent.


The lesson, I suppose, is that we derive our power from being open about our lives and confronting bigotry directly. People respect honesty and they will reject discrimination if we give them the opportunity. The greatest weapon possessed by those who seek to oppress us is our own silence.


Return to Out and Elected in the USA index • Go to next article


This entry is part of the featured exhibit Out and Elected in the USA curated by Ron Schlittler. As it is content created by a named author, editor, or curator, it is not open to editing by the general public. But we strongly encourage you to discuss the content or propose edits on the discussion page, and the author, editor, or curator will make any changes that improve the entry or its content. Thanks.