Difference between revisions of "Talk:U.S. Supreme Court: Lawrence v. Texas, June 26, 2003"
From OutHistory
Jump to navigationJump to searchm (Reverted edits by 94.142.131.197 (Talk); changed back to last version by 77.93.2.81) |
(Comment provided by Keyclesluch - via ArticleComments extension) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | </div><div class='comment'> | ||
+ | <div class='commenttop'> | ||
+ | <div class='username'>Keyclesluch said ...</div> | ||
+ | <div class='date'>10:04, 30 April 2011 (EST)</div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class='commentpost'>http://yawall.ru/ - Обои скачать</div> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 11:04, 30 April 2011
Comments on U.S. Supreme Court: Lawrence v. Texas, June 26, 2003
Keyclesluch said ...
10:04, 30 April 2011 (EST)
http://yawall.ru/ - Обои скачать
The accident caused some delays, but no cancellations, for passengers travelling between Toronto, Ottawa and Montreal. Mine trains are operated in large mines and carry both workers and goods. Many prestigious passenger train services have been given a specific name, some of which have become famous in literature and fiction. In past years, railroaders often referred to passenger trains as the "varnish", alluding to the bygone days of wooden-bodied coaches with their lustrous exterior finishes and fancy livery. "Blocking the varnish" meant a slow-moving freight train was obstructing a fast passenger train, causing delays. Motive power