Longwood University
Longwood University
Author's note: For the majority of this exhibit and those connecting I used articles from Longwood's long-running newspaper the Rotunda, eventually I will talk with the Anthropology Professors whom are experts on Longwood's history
Located in Farmville, Virginia inside of Prince Edward County, Virginia
Hate Rears Its Ugly Head
During the 80s there was great fear and uncertainty about how the Aids virus was transmitted kissing even holding hands were considered possible causes.
The Aids Busters came to Longwood University in the mid-80s after the Aids Epidemic started to come to the spotlight even in the smallest of towns. The small-minded and scared members of these communities took out their fears on the suspects they saw in the news...the homosexual community.
After much speculation, the male-homosexual community was blamed for the outbreak do to the overwhelming number of gays succumbing to the disease.
There was great outrage towards the gay community and organizations like AIDS Busters started popping up everywhere, even schools in the middle of the country were being targeted by Evangelist groups seeking to stop the homosexual community from existing.
Longwood was even more susceptible to these Evangelist groups because Liberty University is only one town over. Liberty is famous for having as its founder Jerry Falwell, a large figure head in the anti-homosexual movements of the day.
The Start of the Revolution
On November 16, 1982, a story broke on Longwood University's campus about a young man by the pseudonym Walt to protect his identity. The story was on the front cover of the Rotunda newspaper. The story was of Walt trying to put together what he called the Longwood Discreet Gay Society. Walt was a practicing bisexual. The general lack of acceptance at Longwood made him realize that there needed to be a support system for the LGBTQ students. Here are some quotes from the newspaper article:
- “At first it was just verbal abuse, people yelling faggot from their window or in the hall. My suitemate wouldn't let me use the phone, which was in my name but in his room. He didn't even pay the bill...I had to pay it. Later they wrote faggot on the door in red magic marker. The thought my roommate (who is straight) was homosexual and started hassling him with cat calls—faggot, faggot.”
- "I went to Dr. Cox (head of Longwood's Counseling Service) because I was worried about a nervous breakdown. He and myself were hoping that incidents would die down after fall break...and they did for half a week. The Wednesday after fall break some people started screaming, 'faggot', I've heard, 'you're a goddamned faggot.' They started kicking on the door to my room. They threatened violence. Later that night, I was in my room alone when I heard my suitemate and apparently some of his friends yelling taunts in the bathroom such as, 'gay rights' or 'sexual preference, sexual preference...oh let me suck that juicy cock' or 'oh bend over and let me drive' and all the while someone was in the background singing America the Beautiful. I felt like going to Captain Stanford and saying 'Sir, I think you should know that one of your ROTC cadets was participating in a homosexual orgy in my bathroom.' I put up with a lot of crap. Anyway, I left my room because I was worried about them getting violent."
These events were prosecuted by the administration. According to Walt, he talked to the administration and they were interested in how many homosexuals/bisexuals he knew of or estimated were on campus. He estimated 13% of the campus was LGBTQ. The administration read this article and responded as such:
- "Last week's front page article, based on an interview with a male homosexual student, could be interpreted to mean that the administration is "100 percent supportive" of a gay movement on campus. Such an interpretation would be incorrect. The student interviewed had met earlier with President Greenwood, the Vice President for student Affairs, and me. At the meeting the student made one request. He wanted us to print an item in the "Campus Bulletin" announcing the date and time for a meeting of gay students. We indicated that we would print the item only if his name appeared with it, since that is the policy for all announcements. He did not want his name used; we therefore refused to carry the announcement. He then asked about forming an organization, and we indicated he had the legal right to do so, but had to follow the procedures, rules, and regulations that applied to the formation of any campus organization. We did not encourage him to start a group; we informed him of his legal right to do so. This should not be interpreted as "being supportive." The article also quotes him as saying that such an organization "could pull in as many as 325 participants or about 13 percent of Longwood's population." When we met with the student, we specifically asked him how many homosexuals he thought were at Longwood. He replied that he knew of only three or four, but assumed there were more. We do not know how he arrived at the 325 figure a day later. While there are many other disturbing aspects to the article, I especially wanted to clarify these misleading statements."
- ~H. Donald Winkler
- Director of Public Affairs
- Longwood College
- "Last week's front page article, based on an interview with a male homosexual student, could be interpreted to mean that the administration is "100 percent supportive" of a gay movement on campus. Such an interpretation would be incorrect. The student interviewed had met earlier with President Greenwood, the Vice President for student Affairs, and me. At the meeting the student made one request. He wanted us to print an item in the "Campus Bulletin" announcing the date and time for a meeting of gay students. We indicated that we would print the item only if his name appeared with it, since that is the policy for all announcements. He did not want his name used; we therefore refused to carry the announcement. He then asked about forming an organization, and we indicated he had the legal right to do so, but had to follow the procedures, rules, and regulations that applied to the formation of any campus organization. We did not encourage him to start a group; we informed him of his legal right to do so. This should not be interpreted as "being supportive." The article also quotes him as saying that such an organization "could pull in as many as 325 participants or about 13 percent of Longwood's population." When we met with the student, we specifically asked him how many homosexuals he thought were at Longwood. He replied that he knew of only three or four, but assumed there were more. We do not know how he arrived at the 325 figure a day later. While there are many other disturbing aspects to the article, I especially wanted to clarify these misleading statements."
In other words the college administration was not as supportive as they came off as to Walt.
For full article:::Media:LDGS_with_Responses.doc
There was a break in LGBTQ news at Longwood University for two year. In 1984 an article came out about what happened to Walt and what the LGBT community was . Apparently he was discovered and harassed unmercifully by students and faculty alike and "forced" back into the closet, and subsequently left Longwood for a more accepting school. The LGBTQ community as a consequence of the discrimination that faced Walt, forced them to retreat "back into the closet".
The Start of the Alliance
The gay movement was underway at Longwood University. More and more students were coming to Longwood both gay and straight. This increase in population over the years allowed more and more diversity to come into Longwood. This diversity also pushed more and more out of state students into the system increasing the political, racial, sexual, and religious diversity of the campus.
Exhibit Pages
Prince Edward County, Virginia
Hampden-Sydney College
